[MOD] VoD Filter

[couch potato]

http://s32.postimg.org/hug83ae9x/Screen_Shot_2016_05_06_at_6_08_51_PM.png
http://s32.postimg.org/x0djm46h1/Screen_Shot_2016_05_06_at_6_09_17_PM.png
http://s32.postimg.org/mh5a87mx1/Screen_Shot_2016_05_06_at_6_09_28_PM.png
http://s32.postimg.org/qiguxdryd/Screen_Shot_2016_05_06_at_6_09_39_PM.png


http://www.mediafire.com/download/ruharmyl0zrbcda/plugin.video.stalker-10.3.2_(VoD_filtered).zip

[MrX4000]

Quick question ... are these all built off each other? I mean they are all adding to the original right? I see in the first photo the options for Acc Syn with the PVR so this would mean all these options are available with this latest release?

Thanks

[couch potato]

quick answer: YEP ! :D

all my releases include all updates from the prior versions

Here's the changelog:

http://pastebin.com/raw/RqbVCKdw

[dara]

I like this. Well done, couch potato!

[MrX4000]

Fantastic ... Thanks

[anon2599]

Kick ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS couch............Really Excellent job.
This is Exactly how I envisage and would have liked it to be via feedback...it`s like you read my mind.

Now all that is required is PPV to function the same as VOD ..if possible . ? e.g.: Same meta and set-up as the VOD section.

Then the add-on will be close too.......... if not already the complete package. ;)

Really AMAZING! work Sir.......Thank you....and also Thank you dara for the support and work you have both applied to make this add-on A*

Regards,

[dara]

The issue with the PPV's is that external data may be needed for the genre info, which would increase load time. That could require including other plug-ins which could impact overall performance as well. couch potato may have a way around that.

The idea with bringing back IPTV Stalker was to have a lightweight client as an alternative to the built-in PVR, and minimal configuration. Just to let people know, it may be time to freeze a version of IPTV Stalker that is 'feature poor' that would work universally.

[couch potato]

@ALL
THANK YOU !
So be truly glad to know that there are (few) people here who still appreciate my "po-tah-to" style ;)


@anon2599
sorry mate
considering dara's suggestion, I think I won't add any features which require any external resources (metadatas, trailers, etc)
all those features will make the loading take longer
and it won't be good for any systems with "poor" specs


@dara
You're absolutely right mate
YES! I have to agree that not everyone needs an app which is so techie & so fancy :D
your idea of releasing the lite-version is the BEST solution for everyone and I will give you full support :)

[anon2599]

All said ...done and dusted.....I am Absolute delighted with the features of the lite version..and full agree with dara and your self couch.

Really splendid work the both of you have done in creating and tweaking this Beast!
Thank you.

Regards,